To Conclude.

I am pleased with my decision in choosing this class. Even before beginning this class I was intrigued with the 70's. Such iconic characters, films and directors thrived and began in this era, along with monumental events taking place. I wanted to learn about these factors and how they influenced what I know, love and watch today.

Taking our time and immersing ourselves into the events of the 70's - watergate, vietnam, the role of the media, etc - it put in perspective and laid the groundwork for many key films of this era. I liked taking our time on these subjects and discussing them in extent.

Delving into iconic directors and their genesis was inspiring. Seeing Coppola's roots as a director and a storyteller was fascinating and humbling. The reason's why he made The Conversation and why it's his most favorite film he's made are all things I love hearing about. This class added personality to each film. We learned the behind the scenes aspects and that it was I will remember most. I love hearing about how films were made, why they were made, where the inspiration was drawn from and so on.

The final project is one I especially enjoyed. I tried for a long time to connect with my issue and how I could best illustrate my point, and through that of talking it out amongst friends it came to light how I should go about it. Prior to executing my PSA, I discussed the issue amongst friends and strangers and in turn became more aware of everything going on with Facebook. I would like to thank this class for opening up such an issue and allowing me to talk and bring attention to this interesting dilemma. It was a revolt on Facebook and if anything, I've made people think more critically about it all.

Personally, I don't respond well to large open discussions. I get more out of and can contribute proactively to a smaller, personal group. I found myself being closed off much of the time during our discussions and that displeased me. I know I wasn't alone on this. I feel that the environment of the screening room wasn't the greatest for discussions. Everyone is looking at the backs of everyone, and a real discussion seems forced. I feel I could've taken more away from this class if we had moved into another classroom that was set up in a circle for discussion.

Nonetheless, I did learn a lot about this era, I learned much about the films of this time and I saw films I would have never watched if it weren't for this class. It opened me up to new styles, and new inspirations. The ability to blog was a much improved aspect of assignments and I felt more open to writing thanks to this approach. This is a class that I would recommend and one that'll stay with me the rest of my career as an aspiring movie maker.

thank you.

Assault on Precinct 13

I hate to say it, but i didn't particularly ENJOY John Carpenter's 1976 film Assault on Precinct 13. It was loaded with continuity errors, forced and ridiculous dialogue and not to mention the weak, thin plot line. But, then again perhaps that is what makes it so charming.

I went into Assault thinking I was getting into an intense and engaging story, and maybe that was my downfall, but i just couldn't connect with this one. Granted there were some eye popping scenes with the child and the ice cream, the relentless shootouts and the slaughtering of human life. And that stuff I LOVE. I think maybe I set my standards high for this one, and was a little let down.

The films did have a certain charm that I liked. It was very 'indie.' This showed what indie looked like in the 70's. The modern day indie can be picked out of the bunch and I enjoy that style. It was very cool to see that style of the 70's. The set pieces, minimal locations, sound issues and neat workarounds all added, or perhaps took away from the film for me. I think I'd like to see this film again, now knowing it's charm and feel. I have a strong feeling I'll get more out of it this time around.

An Unmarried Woman

This is an honesty post.

I am embarrassed to admit that I actually enjoyed this film. By enjoyed I mean I was intrigued the entire time. I'm not sure if it was the whole 'girl talk' or the anticipation of seeing more breasts or maybe even finding out what what our main character Erica (Jill Clayburgh) will do. But, I stayed awake the entire time and enjoyed it.

The topic of this film was an interesting one. An unmarried woman. This film is simply that. Her struggles of dealing with a husband of 16 years leaving her for a younger woman, getting back in the game and dating again, being sexually active with someone else and simply being a good mom. It explores the roles of a woman and her independence in a world where men should take care of them.

I've been living in an apartment with at least one girl for nearly 4 years now. I've been around all the girl talk, all the period talk and everything else that comes in the package of living with girls. That is why I particularly enjoyed the scene where Erica is talking to her therapist about her period. This discussion seems so misplaced or irrelevant. But, it would be considered taboo when it was released in 1978. To have a woman speak on screen about her menstruation? how empowering for woman to hear? It seemed natural and accurate and I found it intriguing.

Even when receiving backlash from many people in class, I still stand my ground on liking this film. They it was boring, uneventful, they didn't care about it, blah blah. Maybe all it takes for me to enjoy a movie is to see some boobies and hear about girl's talking like girls?

Who knows.

Dog Day Afternoon

I had always heard of Sidney Lumet through text books, and readings about film. But never had I seen any of his work. From what I knew about him, he was a methodical, consumed by film kind of director and had enough knowledge to write several books. This style was what I immediately picked up on when we began watching his 1975 account of an actual bank hold up.

We are thrust immediately into the bank, just like they were. The story begins as they pull up. Through Lumet's massive tracking shots that span the length of the bank to the quick reaction shots sprinkled in, this scene has a life of its own. My favorite scene by far, because it plays with the pace of the scenario and human emotion beautifully. The interaction between the hesitant robbers and the nonchalance of the employee's, this sets the mood for the interaction between the two.

The screenwriter and Lumet's deep research into the actual event provided a near actual account which occurred at that Chase Manhattan Bank in Brooklyn, New York. Relying on the directorial methodology called 'the method,' Pacino consumed this character and went into a state of hysteria every time they rolled camera. His performance has been ranked #4 in Premiere Magazine's 100 top performances of all time.

I had no idea what to expect in this film, and I was pleasantly surprised. It was beautifully acted and well shot. The story was unique and engaging. A classic to say the least.